When we get something wrong, we say so here. Clarifications that change how a story should be read are logged publicly — not buried in silence.
Headlines and body copy were adjusted so that contested claims made in testimony are consistently attributed to the witness and not stated as established fact.
We updated the story to make clearer which portions summarise publicly circulating audio and which portions are corroborated by other reporting. No factual finding was withdrawn.
We expanded the methodology note and emphasised that the ruling concerns publication rights, not a determination of the underlying intelligence allegations.